Improved Forest Management: The Importance of Methodology to Reflect Quality

Carbon removal has a measurable climate impact by removing tons of emissions from the atmosphere. True carbon removal methods are rarely questioned for their value or integrity. However, carbon markets have long been flooded with “avoidance” or “reduction” offsets based on counter-factual deforestation claims in absence of carbon credit revenues. Buyers should understand these products and the methodology differences between avoidance and removal in the nature-based product space.
In this whitepaper, Chestnut Carbon offers strategic insights to help corporations align with high-quality, long-duration nature-based carbon credits.
Download our whitepaper for:
- Comparison of credit quality by registry (Verra, ACR)
- Risks of reduction-based credits due to questionable impact standards
- Benefits of removal credits that promote realistic measurements
- Strategies to ensure alignment with high-quality, long-duration credits for real climate outcomes
Understand the benefits and risks of each carbon credit type to make informed buying decisions and achieve your net zero goals. Download now to learn more.
Download the resource
By completing this form, you grant Trellis Group permission to share your information with sponsors of this report and to send you future mailings on related offers. You also agree to Trellis Group’s privacy policy. To view our policy, please click here.